<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: P&amp;P Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bit-of-ivory.com/2005/11/09/pp-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bit-of-ivory.com/2005/11/09/pp-rant/</link>
	<description>"on which I work with a brush so fine as to produce little effect after much labour" -- Jane Austen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:57:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sissoed</title>
		<link>http://bit-of-ivory.com/2005/11/09/pp-rant/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sissoed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-of-ivory.com/?p=747#comment-787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks very much for demonstrating that it is historically inaccurate for the Bennett house to be full of animals as this 2005 movie shows.  While I like the new movie, it struck me that this aspect cannot possibly have been historically accurate, and you have confirmed it.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for demonstrating that it is historically inaccurate for the Bennett house to be full of animals as this 2005 movie shows.  While I like the new movie, it struck me that this aspect cannot possibly have been historically accurate, and you have confirmed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zanitta</title>
		<link>http://bit-of-ivory.com/2005/11/09/pp-rant/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zanitta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bit-of-ivory.com/?p=747#comment-786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having seen the new P&amp;P (it came out in England a couple of months ago) I have to say I like it. It may not be as historically accurate as it could be, but it has a certain scope to it, a size that other adaptions (such as the beeb&#039;s Colin Firth version) don&#039;t quite manage to convey. I love both versions, the size of the newest one and the detail of the older one (after all, I suppose it could be argued that the p&amp;p does focus on a small number of families so why does it need size?) and I would definately say &#039;see it&#039; then at least you can decide after.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having seen the new P&amp;P (it came out in England a couple of months ago) I have to say I like it. It may not be as historically accurate as it could be, but it has a certain scope to it, a size that other adaptions (such as the beeb&#8217;s Colin Firth version) don&#8217;t quite manage to convey. I love both versions, the size of the newest one and the detail of the older one (after all, I suppose it could be argued that the p&amp;p does focus on a small number of families so why does it need size?) and I would definately say &#8216;see it&#8217; then at least you can decide after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
